Sunday, April 4, 2021

The Vengeful Hack, Andrew Cuomo / How a Republican Imagines the Takeover of America / NCAA Caught

We’ll start off with a few paragraphs on the latest politician whose nasty, cynical-to-the-core nature couldn’t be concealed any longer: America’s villain of the moment, Andrew Cuomo.

Mr. Gripes has been long been fascinated how politicians, who outside of public view are often nothing but self-aggrandizing, egomaniacal personalities, manage to escape harsh scrutiny for a long time. Andrew Cuomo is just such a case in point. He’s governed New York State for 11 years, with hardly any disapproval from New Yorkers. Recently, we’ve learned, he’s been revealed as a toxic force for years – he doesn’t simply want to win against an opponent, he becomes hell-bent in attempting to destroy him or her. Not only do his antagonists feel the full wrath of Mr. Cuomo, but his own staff for years has been terrified of him– a reporter who covers Albany calls his personality ‘brutalist.’ 

Now, after a decade, his huge faults have emerged in a torrent. Any news that damages Mr. Cuomo is immediately out there in the public domain these days. How does concealment of a man’s obvious malevolence last for so long? Only through intimidation and fear. Cuomo’s situation now is essentially a modern version of the fairy tale ‘The Emperor Has No Clothes’: a blind, apathetic, uninformed, preoccupied population simply didn’t pay enough attention to a powerful man’s abhorrent behavior, including sexual harassment of young women and inappropriate touching, who as associates of the governor, were additionally asked to wear high heels [his preference? Stilettos] and skirts in his presence.

Can you imagine a demand like that in this day and age? How do you think those women feel about suggestions from higher-ups to dress in a particular manner? Very uncomfortable, I would say. In a more equitable world, suggesting that his staff --only the youthful, pretty women of course -- wear high heels could be labeled  as ‘harassment’ and is grounds for removal from office. It’s sleazy and antediluvian behavior.

Mr. Cuomo knows he’s in deep trouble, so he does what he does best: he lashes out, and uses any means to retain power. His first accuser three weeks ago right after she came forward with her claims of sexual improprieties heard from friends and acquaintances that telephone calls were being made to those friends inquiring about the accuser’s own history. 

The Cuomo operatives were looking for dirt obviously. Not only that, but a letter was prepared by the Cuomo people to be circulated that contained specific actions of the accuser that could only have been gleaned from her employee personnel file. Only a vengeful, powerful boss like Cuomo could have or would have directed someone to open those files – a citizen’s privacy is a sacrosanct right, we thought. Divulging contents from an employee’s files is surely a felony, and Mr. Cuomo, if in fact he did open those files, should go to jail. 


This fact jumped out at Mr. Gripes when he came across a week or two ago: fifty percent of ‘white men’ oppose the COVID Stimulus Act that just passed Congress, and then signed by President Biden. I don’t think it’s coincidental that a very similar percentage – 49% -- of all Trump voters is choosing not to be vaccinated. 

This poll number is in contrast to the 70% percentage of all Americans who assert they will be vaccinated. That’s some proof that most Americans are intelligent enough to protect themselves, while a core of knee-jerk Trump supporters throw aside the strongest of all instincts, self-preservation, to slavishly abide by their Pied Piper and refuse the inoculation. They say ‘no’ to a vaccination that will protect their family, close friends and themselves. Dumb.

[A digression for a moment: the talking heads on television kept repeating the trope that 70% overall approval for the COVID legislation represented ‘strong’ support for Joe Biden.  Actually, commentators on newscasts got it wrong, as usual: 70%, to Mr. Gripes, was a surprisingly low number. After all, virtually every American received an early Christmas gift: $1,400 for one person or $2,800 for couples to gleefully place in their wallets, or spend as they wish, no questions asked. Using that criterion, 95% approval would have seemed to be a more appropriate result.]

But back to the stat that 50% of white men were opposed to the COVID stimulus: the 50% male Caucasian population is against it purely for oppositional reasons – a Democratic ‘victory’ like the COVID bill very likely infuriated that fat, old white guy down there in Florida; and if he’s furious about the loss, so too are his knee-jerk supporters. Doctors to a man or woman say ‘Get the shot.’ Nope, the Trump fanatics assert, we don’t believe them; those doctors and scientists are probably all Communists –or Democrats -- anyway. One fact is unassailable: not one of those Trump puppy dogs is going to refuse that check – despite all their strident nonsense about the vaccine’s potential peril or their phony concern about the growing national debt.

I’m going to now go through an exercise outlining the fears that Republicans of all stripes, I think, worry about when paranoia possesses them: it’s a time line imagining the takeover of America:

Here goes: Biden and the Democrats begin to build momentum in the wake of the stimulus bill win….Biden gets credit from most Americans for solving the COVID national catastrophe; out of the public view, Donald Trump’s popularity diminishes, as Biden’s favorability ratings increase… The Biden approval numbers rise, slowly at first, more significantly later….Congress senses a Biden groundswell, and passes a raft of liberal legislation, like limitations on the right to bear arms, stricter environment regulations, expansion of voters’ rights, an infrastructure initiative [taxes, though, go up]…..Democrats [the ‘lefties’] start winning a lion’s share of Congressional elections… country swings more liberal and left….Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s acolytes win a batch of Representative and Senate races… Her influence in Congress becomes formidable… Congress itself turns more and more left-wing…. Biden runs again and is re-elected…Republicans are vilified and lose one election after another… AOC wields more and more power….Communists stage a coup, and  take over the reins of the government… and, finally, with AOC’s blessing, Nancy Pelosi is anointed Grand Empress of the United States, with Ms Ocasio-Cortez installed as Vice Grand Empress Suprema [She reputedly is the power behind the throne.]


The National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA] is the governing body of college sports for men and women. Its obvious favoritism for men’s activities over women’s is not a secret to anyone who follows college athletics. And, to be perfectly honest, it makes sense from a financial perspective: without the large revenues generated by men’s football and basketball games, the athletic departments in most of these institutions would not be unable to fund all the other lesser varsity teams, intramural competitions and club sports functions.

That is just a fact. Men’s football, of course, is a huge money maker. College football games during the fall offer geysers of television cash that goes to the NCAA coffers to apportion out. The other cash cow is men’s basketball; the annual tournament going on right now will bring in $1 billion just for television rights to this event. The women’s NCAA basketball tournament that’s going on simultaneously? It will lose money.

[An opinion: to this observer, at the risk of sounding like a troglodyte, women’s basketball is fundamentally unwatchable  -- compared with the men, the players seem distressingly slow, turnovers are too frequent, the actual game action can be very sloppy, and, let’s not forget, one of the most exciting plays in basketball – soaring above the basket rim and ‘dunking’ the ball down into the basket -- rarely occurs in women’s basketball; the ascending vertical leap, an important factor in popularizing the men’s game, is simply lacking in women’s games.

The competition among teams is meager as well, as there are not enough top-notch teams that could win the tournament; in fact, on the first day of the women’s tournament, there were two games in which the loser was beaten by almost 50 points! It’s been my belief for a long time that unless women’s sports competitions can create male fans in abundance, they will never be successful and make money. Women, to their credit, eschew spectator sports mostly, so it is the men who are needed to fill the arenas, and generate ticket sales.]

But those problems are a topic for another time. Here I’d like to address a huge problem for the NCAA: the inability to tell the truth about the chasm between the men and the women sports. Perhaps buffeted by the swirling political winds, virtually everything written about women’s sport these days is influenced by gender dynamics.

But that impossible issue is not my focus here: it’s the blatant hypocrisy of the NCAA that infuriates Mr. Gripes. Instead of dealing directly with the dilemma of revenue sharing when one side can’t contribute a dime to the general pot, the NCAA disingenuously  talks about the ‘empowerment’ of the collegiate female ‘student-athlete’, and chatters ad infinitum of the ‘equality’ and ‘parity‘ between the sexes as to the disbursement of funding.  That’s a bold-face lie.

This year, San Antonio and Indianapolis are the hosts for the men’s and women’s tournaments,  and team players for both the women’s and men’s tournaments are sequestered  in just one hotel in each city due to Covid precautions. Workout and training facilities had to be constructed in each hotel so players would not have to venture outdoors and possibly contract the virus. Those ballroom ‘gyms’ inadvertently exposed the vast chasm between the treatments of men versus women by the NCAA. It’s no longer a secret as to the decidedly inferior treatment women are accorded by the association.

The men’s facility in their Indianapolis hotel resembles an airplane hangar in terms of square footage – a huge space outfitted in the newest exercise and weight machines including Nautilus apparatus, stationary and elliptical bikes, and free-weight stations spread out all over the floor. A gorgeous array for the male players, rivaling the best of private gyms.

One enterprising woman player, though, released videos of the men’s facility versus the women’s: the contrast was astounding: compared with the men’s workout area, the women were accorded one tiny piece of real estate: they were given a dozen or so hand weights, up to thirty pounds, stacked in a pile. That miniscule stack could have fit on a small card table, and that was to be the women’s ‘gym.’ All of it.

The NCCA was caught with their pants down. Fumbling for a response to legitimate outcries from the women’s side, they asserted ‘there was not any available space’ for a comparable workout area for the women. Well, that turned out to be another lie, as the same woman player who furnished the original film videotaped later a huge empty room in the women’s hotel, equivalent in floor space to the men’s spacious area.

The ongoing contretemps between the men and women showcases the blatant falsehoods that the NCAA promotes: all the chatter about equal rights and ‘perks’ for women is pure BS. The NCAA’s interests, despite their professed desire to treat the sexes equally, are totally aligned with men’s athletics; ‘we’ll keep the billion-dollar gravy train going, and just humor the women along.’

The association should just drop their malarkey about equivalence. There is none, and there won’t be until women ‘earn’ as much money as the men. That’s the stark reality, and the NCAA overlords should stop pretending otherwise. They sure as hell are not fooling the women players, who almost certainly have dealt with lies out of the mouths of men all their lives.

‘Mr. Gripes’
March 27, 2021
By Jim Israel






Friday, March 5, 2021

The free-market proponents never rest / A silver lining in the January 6th riot / ‘Cancel culture:' fear-mongering by hypocrites

The free-market proponents never rest – even after Texas. Their eternal credo: Eliminate the constrictive regulations strangling business, which will lead to cutting costs, which will result in more money in the pocket for citizens, politicians and CEO’s. A Goldilocks holiday. There’s really no downside, they always assert. The formula can’t miss, can it?

How many times have we gone through a disaster that we’ve just experienced with the Texas electric grid collapse? In reality, it was absolutely nuts to not have back-up electrical capacity in a state essentially built on plentiful and cheap power. Here we are in a heightened extreme weather environment all over the country that we’ll be dealing with for decades, at a minimum. Ah, the siren calls of cheap electricity: the politicians on the take from power companies tout the creation of a stand-alone grid, Texas version, and not spend one dime more to be part of a national one.

To Mr. Gripes, everyone’s complicit in this fiasco: the big-shot power companies who thrived on a de-regulatory environment, the politicians who set up the all-by-its-lonesome electric system and received shovelfuls of cash for doing so, and the average greedy consumer who only sees the prospect of a few more bucks every month in their pockets [yes, let’s admit it: the uninformed citizen always approves of any savings, and doesn’t think of future problems;  he is not the hapless victim that the media portrays]. No redundancy of a viable grid necessary to protect the public meant much lower construction and protection costs, resulting in more money for everyone. Fantastic scheme, wasn’t it? 

No it wasn’t. Whatever profits were created by the Texas model – as I said, dollars going into the pockets of consumers, politicians and CEOs – have been totally eliminated by the stunning cold and snow event earlier last month. And billions, billions more now will have to be spent to repair the system; with the late-to-the-party citizens now demanding back-up, as the new task becomes astronomically expensive. And guess who’s going to have to pay for all this? You got it: the dumb consumer, who’s going to have to pay through the nose. Next time, before another extreme climate event occurs, for once, you politicians should take possession of some foresight, and pay upfront for protection. The consumer-citizen, who a couple of months ago was gleeful over the ten or 11 bucks he saved each month, will be fleeced for years. 

Mr. Gripes has been around for a long time. And he’s learned a thing or two on his bumpy journey. In my eyes, one lesson he’s been taught is immutable: free market economics never works in a complicated system like ours. Erasing regulations that oversee big business always means cutting corners on vigilance and protection, weakening basic performance over time. And, little by little, as once-rigorous standards weaken,  just one calamity brings the whole flimsy structure down. [It happened in New Orleans with Katrina, and in New York, with Super storm Sandy, and let’s not forget the forlorn Enron Corporation.]

One last comment: the audacity of the engineers and politicians is breath-taking. To presume there’d be no weather catastrophe EVER that could leave 14 million residents without electricity and water for weeks is, on its face, criminal. Weather is no friend these days. Something horrific could occur at some point anywhere. Yet, no one – no one – raised sufficient alarm to assert that the elimination of back-up grids had a 100% chance to end in disaster. Not a soul. Human beings are so stupid sometimes.


Mr. Gripes sees a silver lining in the riot of January 6th, in which hundreds of Trump supporters overpowered the police’s security perimeter, poured into the Capitol, captured the Senate chamber, and ransacked the building, ultimately causing injury, death and the destruction of Congressional property. Utter mayhem and chaos.

The media had a field day afterwards, running video-tape loops of the invasion and the pitched battles between cop and invaders, incessantly insisting that American democracy was now ‘in shambles’,  with the founding fathers metaphorically weeping amidst the end of the American democratic ‘experiment.’ The ‘shocking’ images of that day will cause our allies to abandon us, it was proclaimed, and the country’s reputation abroad will be soiled permanently. 

Cable and network news operations have carried on in this hysterical fashion ever since January 6th.  And, now in the past week, we’ve been warned that the Trump protesters are gearing up for another full-blown invasion of the Capitol in March when Biden speaks to Congress..

The hysteria never relents, it seems. If Mr. Gripes may usurp a current term bandied about by the Trump crazies, what’s operating here, I think, is nothing but the ‘deep state’ of television news. No, they’re not pushing right-wing ideology, but something much more mundane: the networks are promoting this line of hysterical coverage for one reason and one reason only: it can maintain high ratings for news shows, ever since Donald Trump, the ultimate lollipop gift to TV news, left for Florida. I think on some level we’re being fed ‘fake news.’

Come on, let’s calm down a bit. First piece of business: the Capitol will not ‘fall’ on the day in March Joe Biden delivers his ‘State of the Union’ speech to Congress. Washington DC will be an extraordinarily locked-down fortress that day, probably better fortified than any American air base in Iraq. 

Second point:  Our democracy and the primacy of the Constitution held steadfast during the post-election onslaught and during weeks afterwards: courts again and again refuted the Trump campaign’s legal challenges to individual states’ voting results, finding no improprieties, in essence certifying Biden’s victory. [Boy, were we fortunate: just imagine another four years of Trump!]

Another aspect of the January 6th invasion of the Capitol that hasn’t really been emphasized is the humiliating conduct of all the law-enforcement entities involved in securing Washington DC, the Capitol and the chambers of Congress. The forces on the premises were woefully undermanned, and there apparently was no sense of urgency once matters turned ugly -- everyone involved was mainly focused on protecting their own rear ends. Heads should have rolled. Not only that, but apparently there was no back-up planning, like reinforcement measures, if things started going south, as they did.

Every one of those law enforcement agencies – the FBI, the DC Metropolitan Police, the Capitol Police, even the National Guard – was asleep at the wheel [9-11, déjà vu, right?]. Sloppy, careless, unforgivable.

But that’s for another day: my point is that all these agencies were terribly embarrassed, and consequently now are going after the attackers with a vengeance, arresting them all over the country [280 at last count]. And that’s my point: if there were no riot on that day, the ultra-right affiliates – the Proud Boys, QAnon, Oath Keepers, etc. – would have remained concealed from public view. Now, I can only imagine the enormous pressure being exerted on these groups – their activities are no longer shielded from exposure, and the full force of American legal power is being utilized to round them up. From now on, these individuals and groups will never operate away from prying ‘eyes’, i.e., cameras, wire taps, infiltration, informants. The FBI and Justice Department are on to them finally, thank God.

Ironically, because of the January 6th mayhem, Americans and their country are likely safer today, and the ultra-right wing nut jobs much weaker.


Here we go again: the latest war cry of the Republican jackals is the new fear-mongering concept called ‘cancel culture.’ It’s become another cudgel to beat over the heads of the opposing party. And what is all this cancel culture nonsense about?  If memory serves me correctly, a couple of years ago at Yale University, some students created a delineated ‘sanctuary’ area on the campus in which only political views that agree with their beliefs would be tolerated – all opposing opinions were not permitted in the prescribed area. If anyone disagreed, he or she would be rendered persona non grata, and ousted.

On its face, cancel culture is nothing but a thinly veiled version of totalitarianism: the ruling state rules, opposition is prohibited, and anyone who disagrees is not only ousted from the group, but ostracized as well. Strip the veil away, and you’re left with the murderous reigns of the Soviet Union’s Joseph Stalin and Iraq’s Khomeini.

For sure, the cancel culture idea, in a free country, is ridiculous, and down the road, dangerous. But what makes Mr. Gripes most angry about the issue is the manner in which the Republican Party accuses Democrats of pushing the issue of blanket cancellation. How dare they promulgate the false premise that Democrats are in league with backers of those Yale students, especially when one looks at the Republican version.

After all, 74% of Republicans across the country still do not accept the result of the recent Presidential election, and insist that it was illegitimate, even if not a scintilla of evidence to that effect has been produced. Talk about cancel culture. Republican office holders, who know damn well that Mr. Biden was elected fairly, assert the results of the past election should be cancelled, and Donald Trump be reinstalled as President.

Put another way, the crown jewel of our democracy, free and legitimate elections, should be jettisoned, only because Mr. Biden won. This comes from the mouths of politicians who then go out and excoriate Democrats for their pushing [another lie] the cancel culture movement.

The sheer size of that hypocrisy is staggering.

Mr. Gripes
By Jim Israel
March 1, 2021


Monday, February 1, 2021

Not exactly the Storming of the Bastille / To every one of the Trump detractors


Not exactly the Storming of the Bastille, was it? The ‘insurrection’, as the media, in their overly dramatic fashion, likes to refer to the riotous behavior of Trump supporters outside and inside Capitol Hill on January 6th, was much less than all the clamorous cacophony would have us believe: engendered by a mob that resembled more a Comic-Con convention than an insurgency, the ‘invaders’, with primitive weapons, no apparent guns, directionless, leaderless, and completely unsure as to where on earth they were going,  or what the hell they were doing. As one reporter observed, ‘for a coup attempt, there was certainly a lot of milling-around.’

The variety of haberdashery parading around in the Capitol in its own perverse way was a testament to the full-throated, free exuberance of American democracy: all kinds of camouflage military regalia; a man clad in a full Revolutionary War uniform; the American flag design made into all types of garments: shirts, pants, even shoes; Tom Brady jerseys; a woman walking around the rotunda grasping a piece of a rostrum from Pelosi’s office; an ornamental police vest slung over someone’s shoulder; guys taking photos of official papers on legislators’ desks, figuring they’ve got their hands on evidence of the rigged election in, say, Wisconsin.

All these morons in the Senate chambers looked a bit abashed – awed actually -- by the surroundings, as it must have finally dawned on each of them that they were very small, inconsequential minnows in a huge ocean, and that a yawning insignificance was to be their fate always.  With the insurrection going nowhere, and having nothing else to do, they even started to pray.

The one individual who, hypothetically, could have galvanized these hooligans into a purposeful force was, of course, President Trump. But he was nowhere to be found. Oh, sure, he encouraged his supporters to action, after his speech 1-1/2 miles away, by asserting he’d march down to the Hill with them and carry on the ‘stop the steal’ fight. 

That’s not quite what happened. After he spoke, he immediately turned his fat ass around, and retreated [yeah, Mr. Gripes uses the term ‘retreat’, an action verb Mr. Trump’s ‘patriots’ would never countenance from their hero, of course. ] to his residential quarters in the White House, to watch the ensuing mayhem, comfortably ensconced on his couch, sipping Diet Cokes and undoubtedly wolfing down pigs-in-the-blanket, a dozen at a time. Not exactly Teddy Roosevelt hustling his Rough Riders up San Juan Hill, was it? The truth is that the germaphobe Mr. Trump can’t stand to be near his disheveled, vermin-carrying true believers at any time, and wouldn’t choose to mingle with an unruly horde like that under any circumstances. 

He might have expressed it this way, ‘Are you kidding? No f__kin’ way… I’ll watch on Fox, thank you, a million miles from those crazies.’


To every one of the Trump detractors, the days after the election right through the inauguration on January 20th can only be described as exhilarating….especially since a lot of us went to bed the night of January 3rd convinced that Mr. Trump had been re-elected, and woke up to the news that he very likely had been beaten.

Biden voters on Election Day were the victims, for the most part, of the television networks operating under ‘recency bias’, meaning that the most current news is considered as most important, and longer-view and older perspectives ranked much lower. The ongoing narrative, at least through the earlier part of the night, was that Donald Trump possessed a huge, increasing lead, and it was very likely too much of an advantage for Mr. Biden to overcome later.

Mr. Gripes was for one, misled by the networks, and sensed, as he went to bed, that Trump was in an indomitable position, and couldn’t lose. I was duped, regrettably, by the media coverage; again, where were the longer-view analysts insisting that a vast number of Mr. Biden’s votes would come in later in the evening? Watching the somnolent Wolf Blitzer solemnly announce very early on that ‘Trump has 760 votes and counting in Florida, and Biden trails with 476’, absolutely useless information, demonstrates how short-term some of the coverage was.

But I digress from my main focus: the days and weeks before January 20 to Trump opponents were some of the most delicious moments since before Mr. Trump took the oath in 2017. Donald Trump, never deviating from a frontal attack on our democratic ideals, attempted in multiple ploys during those weeks to overturn the election of Joe Biden. Republican lawsuits, argued often In front of judges appointed by the Trump administration, were thrown out repeatedly – in fact, I think there was only one legal victory for Trump among 55[!] court cases, and that was to permit a stay of a few days before the same court threw out the suit.

President Trump, who has savaged badly American respect and reverence for our Constitution-based democracy in his four years, probably thought those Republican appointees owed him big time, and that made him particularly angry. Reading about his tearing around the White House at all hours of the night, the enfant terrible, apoplectic at his lawyers, the courts, Republican ‘traitors’, even his most loyal believers, was, to Mr. Gripes, akin to slurping down, as a kid, one of those monster Howard Johnson banana splits with its three huge scoops of different flavored ice cream – ah, the memories. It was pure, unadulterated joy.

And the words and actions of the clown car of enablers and abettors working for Mr. Trump to overthrow the election elicited not fear but a Keystone-Kops comedic overtone to the events going forward. 

Let’s glance at one of the most egregious operatives: Rudy Giuliani. My goodness, he’s fallen off a cliff, hasn’t he? For a year after September 11th, he was adored by the vast majority of Americans as a hero, associated with that resolute image of him walking through the destruction and dust of the Twin Towers that day. The late Jimmy Breslin said it perfectly, ‘Rudy won the jackpot.’ He sure did. ‘America’s Mayor’ managed to amass a huge fortune as a result.

Now? He’s viewed as essentially a thug, and a Trump attack dog, spewing lies and unproven conspiracy theories day after day. 

Here’s one of his most outlandish that may cost him his fortune as well as his law license:

He has accused a voting machine company, Dominion Voting Systems, of manipulating vote counts in many states on Election Day to throw the election to Joe Biden, essentially charging that Trump ballots were altered to Biden ballots, using their machines. The charges don’t stop there, and get even crazier: according to Guiliani and his cohorts, Dominion was created in Venezuela [??] by Hugo Chavez, the Communist baboon who managed to destroy not only the Venezuelan economy, but its flourishing democracy as well. The story goes that Chavez created Dominion to make sure he remained in office through fraudulent ballot counting. Really? Chavez did this? That idiot couldn’t tie his shoelaces.

Mr. Giuliani makes no mention that Dominion’s machines have been utilized in many states without incident in numerous elections over the years, and, yes, even in 2016, when Trump won. 

To continue, Dominion told Giuliani on several occasions to ‘cease and desist’ with his lies, and he did not.

Guess what, and this is to Mr. Gripes the sweetest moment of all during the post-election days: he’s now being sued for $1.3 BILLION, with Dominion asserting he’s caused anguish among employees, even threats, costing the company a million dollars in added protection, and Rudy’s slanderous language – done with ‘malice’, by the way, which makes the libel case much stronger -- has damaged badly Dominion’s reputation and cost it a lot of real business now and in the future as well.

The Dominion CEO said he ‘welcomes’ a full court trial to expose the ‘lies’ of Rudy Guiliani.

Guiliani seems to have a blood lust for amassing money in any fashion he can [he’s even now hawking gold coins on his podcast]. Well, $1.3 billion, Rudy…you better have proof of your allegations; otherwise, after your bank accounts and stock holdings are frozen and then garnished, and after your legal fees go through the roof, you can kiss every penny you own goodbye.

Mr. Gripes                                                  
February 1, 2021
Jim Israel